Temperatures dropping below 15 degrees in early October last fall caused some sugarbeets in western Nebraska to decay at the crown. When decay begins in the beet before it can be processed, it makes the beet unacceptable for sugar production for human consumption.

Sugarbeets not fit for human consumption can be an economical source of feed for beef cattle, and many beets have been fed to cows this winter. How does the loss of beet quality affect their nutritional value for cattle?

In a University of Nebraska research trial with gestating cows, when 20 percent sugarbeets (dry matter basis) replaced 20 percent corn, cows performed similarly. When growing calves were fed 44 percent sugarbeets (dry matter basis) they were more efficient than calves receiving corn. In a finishing diet, however, when sugarbeets replaced corn up to 15 percent, cattle had reduced performance.

When sugarbeets begin to rot, sugars are lost rapidly. When rotting sugarbeets were analyzed for water-soluble carbohydrates, they were found to contain only 26.9 percent, compared to 73 percent in fresh chopped beets. Fat-soluble carbohydrates were 22.7 percent in rotting sugarbeets, compared to 69.5 percent in fresh chopped beets.

Therefore, mixing chopped rotting sugarbeets with straw or poor-quality hay as soon as possible will help reduce sugar loss. Mixing 10 percent poor-quality roughage and 90 percent sugarbeets on an “as- is” or actual pounds basis, and packing in a bunker or agricultural bag is a good way to reduce sugar loss.

The nutrient quality of chopped sugarbeets is different from that of sugarbeet pulp, which is the by-product of sugar production. Sugarbeet pulp has a crude protein content of 10 percent, while sugar beets will likely be 4.5 percent. The neutral detergent fiber of sugarbeet pulp is about 45 percent and only 15 percent in sugar beets, making the sugarbeet more of a comparable substitute for corn in the diet rather than a fiber source. A protein source such as distillers grains or alfalfa would need to be included in a diet with a mixture of poor quality hay/residue and rotting sugar beets.

The amount of sugar left in the rotting sugarbeet will vary, but assuming they have lost 10 percent of their original sugar and are mixed with residue/poor quality hay in the proportions mentioned above, then the mixture could have a total digestible nutrients (TDN) value of about 64 percent.

For assistance developing diets containing chopped sugarbeets, contact University of Nebraska Extension personnel.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.